Renaissance Philanthropy Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 991953380
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2029987795
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $115,242,559
- Expenses
- $28,428,936
- Assets
- $90,684,554
- Liabilities
- $1,451,374
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Tom Kalil (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- KUMAR A GARG (PRESIDENT/SECRETARY)
Highest reported compensation
- Tom Kalil (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $784,305 total reported compensation
- KUMAR A GARG (PRESIDENT/SECRETARY): $611,346 total reported compensation
- Joshua Elliott (Chief Scientist): $465,286 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to fuel a 21st-century renaissance by increasing the ambition of philanthropists, scientists, and innovators. Our vision is a brighter future for all through science, technology, and innovation.
What it reported doing in 2025
RenPhil advances its mission by designing, incubating, and launching time-bound, thesis driven philanthropic funds. The organization's vision is a brighter future for all through science, technology, and innovation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 47% for direct work, and 53% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most filed governance safeguards are in place. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 22.7%; rating input score 23
- Program expense ratio: 90.4%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $107.99 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Pass
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Pass
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.5%; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 75.3%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.19; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 177.8% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 184.1% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 189.6% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 22.7% of revenue deployed · 90.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $784K · 11 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3M reported
- Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 40 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 32 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.