Renaissance Jax

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463826037
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Jacksonville, FL, USA
Phone
9044725028
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development - Business

Reported finances

Revenue
$104,897
Expenses
$90,763
Assets
$57,172
Liabilities
$4,583

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Frank Csar III (President)

People named in this filing

  • Frank Csar III (President)
  • Kevin McClure (Treasurer)
  • Lori Shad (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Renaissance Jax exists to develop the resources to support FIRST Robotics teams in the North Florida region with a goal of having at least one FIRST team in every school in the region Growing teams will allow for thousands of students per year to pursue STEM skills that prepare them for college and the workforce

What it reported doing in 2022

Renaissance Jax held 32 FIRST Robotics events in North Florida impacting more than 2500 students between grades 4 and 12 and allowing them to pursue STEM skills that prepare them for college and the workforce

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 70% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.5%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.5%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $91K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2015 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.