Renaissance Health Service Corporation (Formerly Delta Health Plan Inc)
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 381675667
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lansing, MI, USA
- Phone
- 5173496000
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Group Health Practice (Health Maintenance Organizations)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,783,765
- Expenses
- $790,399
- Assets
- $25,345,940
- Liabilities
- $171,480
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GORAN M JURKOVIC CPA (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- GORAN M JURKOVIC CPA (PRESIDENT & CEO): $12,173,362 total reported compensation
- SUE ELLEN JENKINS (CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER & SECRETARY): $3,291,045 total reported compensation
- AMY L BASEL CPA (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER & TREASURER): $3,169,998 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Renaissance health service corporation's mission has always been to be the leader in our markets, to deliver unmatched quality and value in our programs and services, and to vigorously promote the importance of oral health as an essential part of overall health.
What it reported doing in 2024
To innovate and conduct programs for dental care and make available on a broad scale, the benefits of the science of dentistry to members of the public and to promote and advance research, study and learning in the field of dentistry and related services. Renaissance health service corporation and affiliates processed over 28.6 million claims and provided dental coverage for 15.9 over million people in 2024. Renaissance health service corporation provides funding to support research focused on oral health and the use of biotechnology and genetic tools for cutting-edge diagnosis and treatment of diseases.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.1%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 63.1%; rating input score 63
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 55.7%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 32.07; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 533.1%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.1% of revenue deployed · 63.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $499K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $12.2M · 19 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 47 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.