Religlaw Auxiliary Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842325141
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Provo, UT, USA
Phone
8013766395
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis

Reported finances

Expenses
$851
Assets
$21,796

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • W COLE DURHAM JR (PRESIDENT &)

People named in this filing

  • W COLE DURHAM JR (PRESIDENT &)
  • LYNN ANDERSON (VP & DIRECTO)
  • KENNETH WOOLEY (VP & DIRECTO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose of religlaw auxiliary association is to help secure the blessings of freedom of religion and belief for all people by: expanding, deepening, and disseminating knowledge and expertise regarding the interrelationship of law and religion, and contributing high-quality nonpartisan analysis and research to implementation of principles of religious freedom worldwide.

What it reported doing in 2024

The primary activities of religlaw auxiliary association in 2024 consisted of continuing academic and advocacy work in various countries outside the united states that advanced freedom of religion or belief. This included presentations at various events advancing the concept of human dignity as a foundation for freedom of religion and belief, and continued support for jan figels autobiography covering his historically significant experience as the first eu special envoy on freedom of religion or belief outside the european union.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 25.61; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -10.6% per year; rating input score 0; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -59.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -41.5% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.