Relay Exchange Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
454351950
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Phone
4048162152
Rating
96
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Protestant
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$20,394
Expenses
$22,722
Assets
$4,051
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AMY S KISTULINEC (CO-PRESIDENT/CFO)
  • CAMILLA C WILLIAMS (CO-PRESIDENT/SECRETARY)

People named in this filing

  • AMY S KISTULINEC (CO-PRESIDENT/CFO)
  • CAMILLA C WILLIAMS (CO-PRESIDENT/SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To lead girls to the truth of their redeemed identity in christ, freeing them to pursue his plans, his purposes and his ways; to facilitate the formation of groups focused on bible study and skill development; to encourage and equip group leaders to intentionally pass the baton of faith to the group members; and to provide curriculum for use by the groups.

What it reported doing in 2025

Corporate identity is a critical aspect of relay exchange as the organization is to be self-sustaining through the membership fees and future donations of its members. Relay exchange has adopted a passive approach to fundraising whereby people can make donations to the organization. The organization will not actively solicit donations. Donations received by the organization will be used for member or group scholarships as the board members and officers envision some groups may not be able to support their own activities financially, either through membership fees or needed supplies for the group. As the organization grows, the board members and officers envision that donations would be used to cover at least part of the operating costs that a growing organization might incur. All of the donations are to be used for growing groups or supporting the administrative burden of the organization. Therefore, corporate identity and design is critical in order to remain sustainable.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.4%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $23K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.