Reinvent South Stockton Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 992149563
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Stockton, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2098777210
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $620,761
- Expenses
- $290,139
- Assets
- $335,522
- Liabilities
- $4,900
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Rachel Thompson (Executive Dir.): $38,446 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To empower residents of the South Stockton Promise Zone to transform their community - to affect the root causes of poverty through improvements in safety, education, housing, job creation, and health.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community Resiliency Hub, Community Engagement & Neighborhood Trust Builders - RSSC operated under the fiscal sponsorship of the Tides Center for nine years. In May 2024, RSSC filed for its 501(c)(3) status and transitioned from fiduciary oversight by the Tides Center to independent operations on October 1, 2024. Remaining funds from the fiscal agent were subsequently received. The Community Resiliency Hub serves as a central location for office space, storage, community meetings, trauma-informed systems training, youth and adult organizing, civic engagement, and workforce development. Through the Neighborhood Trust Builders and Health Equity Initiatives, RSSC trained and deployed Community Health Workers (CHWs) to assist residents in navigating challenges related to housing, healthcare, education, and food access. In alignment with our healing-centered and equity-based model, community engagement remains a core strategy. In 2024, RSSC deepened its commitment to community engagement through a wide range of impactful initiatives. The organization led over 70 original events and participated in more than 40 external gatherings, reaching more than 2,000 residents and building relationships with over 100 partner organizations. These efforts resulted in 300 new contacts and the recruitment of 50 new volunteers. Highlights included the South Stockton Candidate Forum, which drew 350 attendees and additional online participants, and the South Stockton Resident Summit, which welcomed over 400 attendees and featured presentations from more than 20 organizations. RSSC also played a key role in the BUILD Health Challenge, convening equity-focused workshops and health education sessions in collaboration with Trust for Public Land, Dignity Health, and CommonSpirit. Through its Trauma-Informed Systems 101 training, RSSC equipped over 150 agency staff with foundational knowledge, and certified 15 local trainers via the Trauma Transcended 360 program, led by the Justice League of San Joaquin. The Heal the Healers wellness circle provided support to more than 100 first responders, therapists, and frontline workers. Additionally, RSSC actively participated in the Accountable Community for Health (ACH) in the Central Valley and contributed to planning for the Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA), reinforcing its role as a trusted convener and advocate for health equity.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 32.1%; rating input score 32
- Program expense ratio: 68.6%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $33.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 53.3%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.16; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.3%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 32.1% of revenue deployed · 68.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $199K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $38K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.