Reino Capital
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453533728
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Garland, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9722710999
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $369,607
- Expenses
- $467,347
- Assets
- $1,774,038
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RODNEY NEALEIGH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- RODNEY NEALEIGH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $106,090 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Reino capital, a Texas nonprofit corporation, is organized and operated exclusively for charitable, religious and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended.within the scope of the foregoing purposes, the corporation will create and facilitate a greater awareness of god's power and working globally. In furtherance of these purposes, the corporation will produce videos designed (i) to promote greater missionary efficiency, (ii) to promote the works of selected missionaries, (iii) to raise funds for missionary work, and (iv) for use in leadership training for christian organizations in various countries. The corporation also will provide grants to organizations in furtherance of their missionary efforts. The organizations that the corporation will partner with and/or support are chosen based on their effectiveness in the propagation of the good news of the salvation.
What it reported doing in 2024
Video production to support missionary works and promotion of greater missionary efficiency.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 16
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.6%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 56.3%; rating input score 56
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 48.7%; rating input score 49; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -26.4%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.8; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.7%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.6% of revenue deployed · 56.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $263K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $106K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.