Reining Horse Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731575062
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4059467400
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $699,920
- Expenses
- $404,161
- Assets
- $3,207,463
- Liabilities
- $34,155
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TIM ANDERSON (PRESIDENT)
- RICK CLARK (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TIM ANDERSON (PRESIDENT)
- RICK CLARK (VICE PRESIDENT)
- NANCY TAGUE (SECRETARY/TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We care for and honor our reining community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Youth leadership & officers:"educating the future of reining"the national reining horse youth association (nrhya) is a leadership organization supported by the foundation, opent to all youth members of the association. Nrhya elects two delegates in each region of nrha competition and has six elected national officer positions - president, vice president, treasurer/secretary, historian, international liaison, and event coordinator. Affiliates can also elect a youth affiliate liaison role to allow for mor leadership positions accross the country.the nrhya has initiated a youth leadership and educational program titled the varsity reining club ("vrc") that is supported by the foundation and is open to all youth members of the association. The vrc was established to engage youth members and encourage them to become more active at both local and national levels. This program offers nrhya members opportunities to contribute to the youth association in additiona to developing valuable life skills that will allow them to be successful contributing members of society. In addition to the youth members interacting with one another and participating in the program, the foundation wants to provide life skills that will help them grow and mature. Stressing the importance of the community service, being an active member in a group and learning to work with others, public speaking, written communications skills and creativity are all important skills that can be futher developed by participating in this program. Nrhya members are awarded points for participating in the following leadership and educational type activities of the varsity reinging club: community service, volunteering and assisting at approved nrha events, assisting with fundraising activities of local clubs, photography of equine-related activities, creative writing concerning equine events (fictional or non-fictional), a news style article reporting on factual events that are equine related, arts and crafts with an equine-based theme, and holding and organizing an nrhya meeting. The foundation provides 13 scholarships totaling $5,000 in total awards to the vrc program each year, and the scholarships are awarded based on the points earned by the vrc participants.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 91% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.1%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 84.4%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $32.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42.3%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.94; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.1% of revenue deployed · 84.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $341K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 24 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 24 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Fund balance restriction sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.