Reijim Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742317361
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Pueblo, CO, USA
- Phone
- 7195645335
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $745,622
- Expenses
- $80,838
- Assets
- $3,171,770
- Liabilities
- $1,311
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DONNA BAKER (PRESIDENT)
- BEVERLY TRUJILLO (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- VALERIE BUNDY (BOARD MEMBER)
- VINCE GUERRERO (BOARD MEMBER)
- CHERISE JOHNSON (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Dreamweavers provides dream vacations and other experiences to children with life-threatening illnesses
What it reported doing in 2025
Dreamweavers provides dream vacations and other experiences to children with life-threatening illnesses and their families. Dreamweavers serves approximately 200 families each year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 71% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 96% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - Most voting board members are independent and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 57
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 93
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 17.2%; rating input score 17
- Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 89.2%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 39.24; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 17.2% of revenue deployed · 88.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $72K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 19 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.