Reid Park Zoological Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942379052
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Tucson, AZ, USA
Phone
5208814754
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,172,020
Expenses
$13,309,273
Assets
$19,103,531
Liabilities
$1,903,125

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NANCY KLUGE (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • NANCY KLUGE (PRESIDENT & CEO): $230,246 total reported compensation
  • TONG CHENG (CFO): $150,914 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To connect people with animals, inspiring the protection of wild animals and wild places.

What it reported doing in 2024

Animal care and animal health - reid park zoo's largest program area is providing the best life for the animals under our care. Reid park zoo's highly dedicated animal care and veterinary team work to ensure the zoo's collection of nearly 400 animals is healthy and thriving. Animal wellness is overseen by the zoo's animal behavior and well-being program leader. Reid park zoo participates in the species survival plan (ssp) through the association of zoos and aquariums (aza) to ensure genetic diversity and healthy populations. The zoo also has a robust scientific research program, participating in research that advances the health and knowledge of species in human care and in the wild.conservation programs: reid park zoo continues to expand its conservation grant program to protect wild animals and wild places around the world. In fiscal year 2025, 15 grants were awarded. The zoo remains co-vice chair for the safe: andean highland flamingo program and has a leading role in the education working groups for safe: north american songbird and safe: north american monarch. The zoo regularly conducts free community science programs focusing on the native songbirds and monarchs that visit the zoo in addition to maintaining a pollinator garden to provide habitat for these native species. To highlight its sustainability practices, the zoo was certified as a green business by local first Arizona.education programs: reid park zoo's education programs are committed to connecting our diverse community with wild animals and wild places, to promote a better understanding of the zoo's role in animal care and conservation, and to instill responsibility for individual choices that help protect the environment. Programs this year included education programs for schools offered either at the zoo or at the schools, animal experiences for non-school groups, outreach programs to community groups, and summer and winter camps. This past fiscal year, we reached 31,982 people, 80% (25,427) people received zoo education experiences for free due to grant funding or programs provided at no cost.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 76% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.6%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 87%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.16 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 97.7%; rating input score 98; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.44; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.6% of revenue deployed · 87% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $230K · 22 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $724K reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 13 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.