Rehoboth Mckinley Christian Health Care Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850313268
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022
- Location
- Gallup, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5058637000
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $63,060,572
- Expenses
- $84,944,747
- Assets
- $53,188,952
- Liabilities
- $67,577,928
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DON SMITHBURG (INTERIM CEO TO MARCH 2022)
- ROBERT WHITAKER (CEO FROM APRIL 2022)
Highest reported compensation
- LETITIA BRADFORD MD (PHYSICIAN): $594,563 total reported compensation
- JOHN YORK (PHYSICIAN): $571,237 total reported compensation
- CHARLES J S GUIMARAES (PHYSICIAN): $508,768 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of rmchcs is to serve god by making a profound and lasting difference in the health and quality of life for all people in the community.
What it reported doing in 2022
Hospital services include medical care services and/or surgical care services provided to patients in an inpatient, outpatient and/or emergency setting.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 13
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 80%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -34.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.27; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 80% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $68M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $595K · 17 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $9.7M reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2009 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.