Rehabilitation and Community Providers Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222839539
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Harrisburg, PA, USA
Phone
7173643280
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,901,062
Expenses
$3,345,087
Assets
$9,122,588
Liabilities
$2,215,287

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RICHARD EDLEY (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • RICHARD EDLEY (PRESIDENT/CEO): $347,569 total reported compensation
  • JAMES E SHARP (DIRECTOR, CHILDREN'S DIVIS): $201,253 total reported compensation
  • JASON SNYDER (DIRECTOR, DRUG & ALCOHOL D): $152,228 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The rehabilitation and community providers association (association) was established to unite agencies, entities, and facilities who are in the business of providing quality health, human, and rehabilitative services, including but not limited to medical, mental health, community residential intellectual and developmental disability, substance use disorder, and vocational rehabilitative services to persons within the commonwealth of Pennsylvania in a common association.

What it reported doing in 2024

Hold meetings and educational conferences of providers of medical, psychological, social, educational, residential, vocational, and employment rehabilitation services to people with physical, mental, emotional, or cognitive disabilities. The association sponsors an annual conference that hosts rehabilitation and community provider association (rcpa) corporate members, associate members, people with disabilities, students, academics, interested professionals, and government representatives. The conference sessions provide information on current developments and new approaches to rehabilitation. Rcpa also hosts more than forty regional and statewide meetings on public issues of concern to its members. In addition, rcpa offers a series of educational sessions throughout the year that focus on changes in regulations, innovations, and system improvements.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14.3%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.73; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24.7%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 18 of 19 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $348K · 22 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.