Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
911922572
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2009
Location
Guilford, VT, USA
Phone
8025798565
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$266
Expenses
$895
Assets
$9,720
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sabrina Seeger (President)

People named in this filing

  • Sabrina Seeger (President)
  • Janet Dickinson (Co-Treasurer)
  • Juliana Post-Good (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

VTRID is a nonprofit organization. We are the state affiliate chapter of the national organization: Registry of Interpreter's for the Deaf. We provide professional development opportunities and Deaf events throughout the state of Vermont. VTRID membership formally meets twice a year. We provide scholarship funds to our members. We also run a list serv of events and a website, and we offer an annual BBQ for the Deaf Community in Vermont.

What it reported doing in 2023

We had four (4) membership meetings, three via Zoom and one in-person. We gifted two (2) members with scholarships for professional development. We supported three Deaf Community events and hosted one event for the Deaf Community and interpreters (in June). Two of the three events involved volunteer time by the membership.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -236.5%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.86; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -17.7% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2009 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.