Registered Nurses Professional Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942578139
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Jose, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4082926061
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,842,573
- Expenses
- $2,415,639
- Assets
- $6,001,750
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MAYBELLINE L QUE (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TIFFANY TALERICO (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SUSAN C YORK (PRESIDENT)
- ALLAN S KAMARA (FORMER PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SHANNON C RUTH (ASSOCIATION REPRESENTATIVE): $232,319 total reported compensation
- THELMA L DODSON (ASSOCIATION REPRESENTATIVE): $167,691 total reported compensation
- MAYBELLINE L QUE (VICE PRESIDENT): $163,799 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The registered nurses professional association (rnpa) is committed to obtaining the highest level of quality patient care and professional nursing standards by empowering each nurse to achieve professional goals as individuals and as an organization.rnpa is committed to advocating for rnpa members in matters of wages, hours and working conditions throughout santa clara valley healthcare. We are dedicated to promoting excellence in nursing that supports quality patient care and professional nursing standards that strive to ensure our members are aligned with surrounding healthcare organizations and evidence-based care.
What it reported doing in 2024
Rnpa is committed to obtaining the highest level of quality patient care and professional nursing standards by empowering each nurse to achieve professional goals as individuals and as an organization. Rnpa is committed to advocating for rnpa members in matters of wages, hours and working conditions throughout santa clara valley healthcare. We are dedicated to promoting excellence in nursing that supports quality patient care and professional nursing standards that strive to ensure our members are aligned with surrounding healthcare organizations and evidence-based care.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 59
- Accountability: 23
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 83.5%; rating input score 83; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.48; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 51.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 0 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $232K · 14 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $155K reported
- Consistency: 9 of 10 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.