Regional Manufacturing Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271992861
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Mansfield, OH, USA
- Rating
- 38
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Business and Industry
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $39,782
- Expenses
- $15,547
- Assets
- $84,988
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ann Downs (Executive Director)
- Zoi Romanchuk (President)
People named in this filing
- Ann Downs (Executive Director)
- Don Paullin (Treasurer)
- Pam Stimpert (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of this Corporation shall be to provide a network for North Central Ohio manufacturers to share ideas best practices business challenges and issues that are common among all the Members of the Corporation which are in this region. This Corporation is organized exclusively for charitable education and scientific purposes including for such purposes the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations under section 501c3 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 or corresponding provision of any future United States Internal Revenue Law.
What it reported doing in 2025
Donation to North Central Ohio Industrial Museum to help preserve the unique history of manufacturing in our area and promote its future.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 4
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 7.3%; rating input score 7
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 60.9%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.47; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 51.5%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 7.3% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 6 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.