ReGenerations Aging Services

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933813617
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Katy, TX, USA
Phone
7139097377
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Reported finances

Revenue
$225,564
Expenses
$220,883
Assets
$56,397
Liabilities
$71,726

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • Talitha Guinn-Shaver (Executive Dir.): $138,259 total reported compensation
  • Julia Martinez (Secretary): $23,000 total reported compensation
  • Atim Kavi (COO): $16,060 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide training and technical assistance to elder abuse case review multidisciplinary teams through the administration of the Elder Justice Initiative's MDT Technical Assistance Center. Strengthening the Elder Justice field.

What it reported doing in 2024

ReGenerations contracted with the Department of Justice, Elder Justice Initiative to administer the Multidisciplinary Team Technical Assistance Center (MDT TAC) and executed the following deliverables: Tribal Webinar Series The tribal webinar series explored topics related to collaboration and coordination of elder abuse cases in tribal communities with experts from tribal teams and government programs demonstrating best practices and highlighting lessons learned. https://campaignlp.constantcontact.com/em/1132418723253/7cf32cba-b4d0-4700-a82a-955a2a6fa9b2 MDT Summit On May 29-30, 2025, the Elder Justice Initiatives Multidisciplinary Team Technical Assistance Center (MDT TAC), in cooperation with the Office for Victims of Crime (OVC), hosted the first (virtual) National Elder Abuse Multidisciplinary Team Summit. The MDT Summit highlighted best practices and developing trends to encourage the adoption of practices to improve older victims access to justice, engagement, system experience, recovery, and long-term well-being while holding offenders accountable through prosecution. Importantly, representatives from MDTs (in all phases of development from planning to established) attended the Summit. The nearly 400 attendees were educated by subject matter experts in trauma-informed https://www.justice.gov/archives/elderjustice/national-elder-abuse-multidisciplinary-team-summit National Elder Abuse MDT Listening Session Report Conducted ten listening sessions with 101 participants to gather field-driven perspectives that directly informed the Summit agenda and materials. https://www.justice.gov/archives/elderjustice/media/1401381/dl? inline 2025 Updates from the Field MDT Summit participants were invited to share lessons learned from the field. The following peer-learning presentation was developed and is the first of its kind showcasing elder justice work at the local level in every state in the US. https://www.justice.gov/elderjustice/media/1398851/dl? inline Types of Teams - Definitions Developed the first publication of its kind to establish a shared language for the field and to help emerging teams identify suitable MDT models for their communities. https://www.justice.gov/elderjustice/media/1399996/dl? inline MDT Guide and Toolkit v2 Released May 15, 2025, the MDT Guide and Toolkit has been updated with new content, including a new chapter on trauma-informed and victim-centered responses. https://www.justice.gov/elderjustice/mdt-guide-toolkit MDT Literature Review Compiled existing research and promising practices to guide discussions and planning among MDTs. https://www.justice.gov/elderjustice/media/1395681/dl? inline MDT Statutory Review: Updated in May 2025 to reflect the latest MDT statutory activity among the states. https://www.justice.gov/elderjustice/file/960791/dl? inline

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 60
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.6%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 90.5%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.1%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.27; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 80.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.6% of revenue deployed · 90.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $200K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $138K · 3 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.