Regency Park Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
113650002
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Jacksonville, FL, USA
Phone
9043535993
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$84,694
Expenses
$84,694
Assets
$53,540
Liabilities
$53,540

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ALEXA DANIELS (DIRECTOR)
  • SANDY CURLEY (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Regency park association, inc. ("association") was formed exclusivelywithin the meaning of section 501(c)(4) of the internal revenue code, operating primarily for the purpose of bringing about civicbetterment and social improvements and to do all the things necessaryfor and incidental to the accomplishments of the purposes and goalsof the association.the association's stated purpose, pursuant to article three of thearticles of incorporation, is to acquire, equip, manage, maintain, and repair the common areas for the regency park north office parklocated in hillsborough county, Florida. The owners of the property, which the common area surrounds, pay the association quarterly basedon budgeted costs. Any overage or shortfall in payments receivedfrom the surrounding property owners are either refunded or billedadditionally on an annual basis. Pursuant to the articles ofincorporation, article three, the association is not permitted tomake a profit.

What it reported doing in 2025

Costs incurred to operate and maintain the common areas of a retail office park.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -17.6% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 33.8% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.