Refugee Council USA
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 871437940
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2025737346
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ethnic, Immigrant Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $913,848
- Expenses
- $900,900
- Assets
- $230,321
- Liabilities
- $7,438
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN SLOCUM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN SLOCUM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $179,746 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule orcusa is the membership association for the ten national resettlement agencies and more than thirty other nonprofits serving and advocating for refugees and other forcibly displaced people. Rcusa provides its members with a platform for coordinating advocacy, communications, and resettlement operations, arranges for its members regular high-level meetings with government officials, and facilitates access to international refugee policy arenas. Rcusa works to improve and expand resettlement, asylum, humanitarian protection, and inclusion for forcibly displaced populations; strengthen the collective power and effectiveness of rcusa members and partners in delivering responsive, equity-focused policies and programs and driving systemic change; and enhance the role of forcibly displaced people as leaders, experts, and advocates to influence policies, programs, and perceptions.
What it reported doing in 2024
Rcusa strengthens the collective power and effectiveness of its members and partners in delivering responsive, equity-focused policies and programs and driving systemic change. Rcusa carries out this work by providing a number of ongoing platforms for our member organizations to coordinate advocacy, communications, and resettlement operations, including through convening of monthly or biweekly meetings of member-led, staff facilitated committees and working groups. Rcusa also facilitates periodic in-person and virtual meetings with us government officials, and hosts rcusa policy center webinars on key topics of interest to our membership. To be continuted on schedule oin early 2024, through our interaction with the federal government, rcusa helped unlock $82 million in additional federal funding for refugee housing. Throughout the year, rcusa advocates for measures to improve and expand resettlement, asylum, humanitarian protection, and inclusion for forcibly displaced populations. A highlight of this work is our annual national advocacy days event, rcusa brings constituents from across the united states to Washington dc to speak to members of congress and their staffs about the importance of refugee protection and the vital contributions of resettled refugees, asylees, and other formerly displaced persons to local communities across the county. In may 2024, rcusa's national advocacy days drew some 300 constituent-advocates from 35 states, about half of them with lived experience of forced displacement, to meetings with 147 congressional offices. During advocacy days, more than 100 formerly displaced persons also participated in a day-long refugee leadership training event. Rcusa is a founding partner in the us refugee advisory board, a pioneering non-government body that channels the participation of formerly displaced people into us government delegations to relevant international refugee policy bodies, thus providing a mechanism to ensure there is meaningful engagement by refugees in policies affecting them. Rcusa is also working to improve the measures used to gauge successful integration of refugees into local communities in the us, so that the way integration is measured better captures the range of interests, needs, priorities, and experiences of refugees themselves. Rcusa helps represent the refugee-serving civil society community in global refugee policy forums. Rcusa assembled and led us civil-society delegations to the february 2024 working group on resettlement meeting (held in sydney, australia), and the june 2024 consultations on resettlement and complementary pathways (hosted by unhcr in geneva, switzerland). Rcusa participated (alongside counterpart civil society organizations in canada, australia, and new zealand) in the launch of a new international networking platform for refugee resettlement practitioners, the international refugee integration and settlement exchange (irise). Rcusa further served its member organizations in 2024 by organizing two presidential transition documents to help guide refugee advocacy approaches in the event of either a biden or trump electoral victory in the november 2024 election.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 57
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.4%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 69.4%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $55.79 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.4%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.4% of revenue deployed · 69.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $625K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $180K · 18 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.