Reflections of Grace Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263943927
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- North Huntingdon, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7248644962
- Rating
- 49
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $179,307
- Expenses
- $55,880
- Assets
- $314,811
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- Tamara Ekis President (11811 Quarterhorse Dr., NH, PA 15642)
- Brian Ekis TreasuererSecratary (11811 Quarterhorse Dr., NH, PA 15642)
- Patricia Mahlstedt Board Member (249 Cascade Rd., Pittsburgh, PA 15221)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Support-financial grants were provided to children diagnosed with Pediatric Brain Cancer; Awareness-Descriptive pamphlets and awareness materials provided to all even participants Treatment-funding for treatment and research to find a cure for pediatric brain cancer
What it reported doing in 2024
Awareness-Descriptive pamphlets and other awareness materials provided to all event participants; Pediatric brain cancer events
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 72% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - Revenue comfortably covers expenses and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 53
- Accountability: 47
- Sustainability: 87
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 24.5%; rating input score 25
- Program expense ratio: 77.4%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 68.8%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.63; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 24.5% of revenue deployed · 77.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $43K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 19 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 25/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.