Redwood Sport Boosters Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208309350
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Saratoga, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4088673042
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $161,363
- Expenses
- $128,073
- Assets
- $80,916
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Amanda Follmar (President)
- Nina Wang (Vice-President, Treasurer, Awards)
People named in this filing
- Amanda Follmar (President)
- Nina Wang (Vice-President, Treasurer, Awards)
- Caitlin Swentzel (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
After-school sports program for Redwood Middle School
What it reported doing in 2024
Total participants: 436......basketball: boys 35+girls 25 ...cross country: 78 ...field hockey: 9 ...flag football: 10...running club: 10...soccer: boys 31+girls 35...softball: 17...tennis: 22...track/field: 67 ...volleyball: boys 30+girls 37
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.1%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 92.1%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.6%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.1% of revenue deployed · 92.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $118K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.