Redwood Empire Youth Baseball Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810612062
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Santa Rosa, CA, USA
Phone
7075278444
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Baseball, Softball

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,700
Expenses
$35,698
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Joel S Erickson (President)
  • Derek DeBenedetti (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Joel S Erickson (President)
  • Derek DeBenedetti (Vice President)
  • Michael Paul (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide training and a competitive environment for youth of the Redwood Empire in amateur baseball.

What it reported doing in 2013

The purpose of the organization, as stated in its Bylaws, is "to form a baseball association to teach baseball to youth between the ages of 14 and 16, to foster national amateur baseball competition and to support and develop amateur athletes and teams for national competition". In 2004 the organization expanded its mission to include youths up to 18 years of age, with the same purposes of teaching and development, and in 2009, youth of up to 22 years of age were included in this expansion. After 11 years of operation the organization stopped competition and closed. The funds in the bank were used to pay final legal fees and the uniforms and equipment remaining was donated to Goodwill Industries of the Redwood Empire.Joel S. Erickson, M.D., PresidentRedwood Empire Youth Baseball Association

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -181.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -66.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -66.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.