Redwood Empire Foster Parent Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237100613
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Santa Rosa, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7073378304
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $62,197
- Expenses
- $75,852
- Assets
- $321,721
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIMBERLY STREETER (PRESIDENT)
- CHERYL BRUNSLIK (INTERIM VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KIMBERLY STREETER (PRESIDENT)
- CHERYL BRUNSLIK (INTERIM VICE PRESIDENT)
- MICHELLE KELSEY (INTERIM SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the general welfare of neglected dependent chlidren, to support the training and recruitment of foster parents, and to develop a better understnding and raise awareness of issues involving foster home care
What it reported doing in 2025
Blue bag project - provides duffel bags packed with gender/size/season specific clothing toys and personal quilt to young children entering foster care while providing gift cards hygiene kits and quilts to older childrent entering foster care
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 62% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 81% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 91
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.3%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 56%; rating input score 56
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -22%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.24; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.3% of revenue deployed · 56% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.