Redwater Valley Ambulance Service

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
816022852
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Circle, MT, USA
Phone
4064852313
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$166,066
Expenses
$33,900
Assets
$351,186
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KIM BRADLEY (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • BILLIE MURY (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KIM BRADLEY (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • BILLIE MURY (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SHAYLYN BARNES (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Redwater valey ambulance service, inc's fundamental mission is to provide the highest level of pre-hospital basic or advanced life support while assuring high quality patient care and appropriate response in emergengy situations. In cooperation with the state and integrated with other agencies, we will promote all aspects of a comprehensive system of pre-hospital emergency medical care. We will also provide the highest quality continuing education for individuals who provide emergency medical services.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide pre-hospital basic or advanced life support while assuring high quality patient care and appropriate response in emergency situations

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 79.6%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.36; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.1%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -19.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.