Redmond Tech Orchestra

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
990596911
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Renton, WA, USA
Phone
4255222706
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Symphony Orchestras

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$153,944
Expenses
$94,696
Assets
$100,578
Liabilities
$1,779

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Peter Yang (President)
  • Nandhini Lakuduva (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Peter Yang (President)
  • Nandhini Lakuduva (Vice President)
  • Jada Campbell (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Redmond Tech Orchestra shall inspire, educate, and serve the local community in enriching lives through the beauty and shared experience of orchestral music. We are dedicated to fostering a vibrant cultural environment, supporting musical education, and ensuring that the joy of orchestral performances is accessible to all.

What it reported doing in 2025

Redmond Tech Orchestra is committed to making orchestral music accessible and enriching for the community. By hosting affordable concerts and collaborating with other organizations, RTO promotes cultural enrichment and supports musical education through programs, workshops, and performance opportunities for young musicians. The organization ensures inclusivity, operates with transparency, engages volunteers and donors, adheres to legal standards, and maintains long-term sustainability. Additionally, RTO complies with federal guidelines and provides a platform for local musicians to showcase their talent.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 46
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 37.4%; rating input score 37
  • Program expense ratio: 60.8%; rating input score 61

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 38.5%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 87.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 63.3% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 78.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 37.4% of revenue deployed · 60.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $58K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.