Reddington Cemetery Perpetual Care Trust
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 816211662
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Seymour, IN, USA
- Phone
- 8125223607
- Rating
- 47
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Cemeteries
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $28,077
- Expenses
- $6,767
- Assets
- $325,074
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
People named in this filing
- JACKSON COUNTY BANK (TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The reddington cemetery perpetual care trust was established by the reddington cemetery association to provide for the long-term care and maintenance of the reddington cemetery. After payment of any necessary expenses for administration of the perpetual care trust, the trustee shall disburse to the person or entity recognized as the caretaker of the reddington cemetery, so much of the net trust income that is necessary, in the discretion of the trustee, for the care and maintenance of the cemetery.
What it reported doing in 2025
The trust is a perpetual care fund established to provide for the care and maintenance of the cemetery operated by the reddington cemetery association.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 15
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 24.3%; rating input score 24
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 75.9%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 48.04; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 61.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 24.3% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.