Red Wind Consulting Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
203369356
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-N 2007
Location
Colorado Spgs, CO, USA
Phone
7192092252
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,082,776
Expenses
$1,068,152
Assets
$14,624
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Victoria Ybanez (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Victoria Ybanez (Executive Director): $127,741 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Strengthen Tribal programs and Native organizations ability to develop and enhance local responses to domestic violence sexual assault and stalking through training and tribal technical assistance. Training to develop implement transitional housing program. Develop policies.

What it reported doing in 2023

Maitained a crisis response providing services to victims of domestic violence sexual assault dating violence and stalking. Services included safety planning emergency shelter emergency assistance emotional support and assistance with accessing community resources. Provided 2 Sexual Assault Tribal Advocate Institutes SATI and 2 Domestic Abuse Tribal Advocate Institutes DATI in Colorado Springs CO. Provided national technical assistance to grantees of the Office on Violence against Women focused on grantees for the Grants to Tribal Governments through the Tribal Affairs Division. Provided Implementation workshops in Alaska, California and Minnesota for Tribal Goivernments Grantees. Provided a National Tribal Summit held in Jacksonville Florida. Provided national technical assistance to grantees of the Office onViolence against Women focused on the development and implementation of responses to domestic violence sexual assault dating violence stalking and sex trafficking. Provided training and techn ical assistance to Tribal Colleges and Universities. Provided training and technical assistance to urban Native programs addressing domestic and sexual violence. Created Responses for Urban Native Program Development and Tribal Coordinated Community Response Toolkits.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 94% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.5%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 90.7%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.4%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89.5% of revenue deployed · 90.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $969K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $128K · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 38 of 41 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2012 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX OtherEmployeeBenefits column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.