Red Willow Learning Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
800607279
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Missoula, MT, USA
Phone
4068802639
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Personal Social Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$102,185
Expenses
$102,529
Assets
$15,174
Liabilities
$22,177

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

People named in this filing

  • KATHLEEN MANGAN (EXEC. DIRECTOR)
  • THOMAS MCCLINTOCK (OFFICE MANAGER)
  • AMY SINGER (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide mind/body based experiences for trauma victims

What it reported doing in 2024

THE ORGANIZATION BEGAN SPECIFIC PROGRAMMING FOR MILITARY VETERANS, FIRST RESPONDERS & EMS PERSONNEL. THIS PROGRAM IS UNDER THE UMBRELLA OF PROGRAM AREA 1 HEALING THE INDIVIDUAL.THIS REFERS TO LINE 28 ON THE 990-EZ (NOT ON PICK LIST)Research; adding to the body of scientific research supporting the usefulness & validity of modalities used to work with survivors of direct trauma as well as secondary trauma. In 2025 we served 41 individuals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.5%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 73.3%; rating input score 73

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.3%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.46; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 48.7%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73.5% of revenue deployed · 73.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $75K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.