Red River Valley Dental Access Project

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
912094334
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Moorhead, MN, USA
Phone
2187907790
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,385
Expenses
$31,758
Assets
$37,094
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARSHA KRUMM RDA (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • JEN RUUD RDA (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • DR CHRIS SCHMALTZ DDS (PRESIDENT)
  • DR BOB MACK DDS (SECRETARY/VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARSHA KRUMM RDA (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • JEN RUUD RDA (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • DR CHRIS SCHMALTZ DDS (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promotion of access for oral health care.

What it reported doing in 2024

In fiscal year 2025, rrvdap had 41 volunteer dentists "urgent care/walk in dental clinic" program: serving low-income, uninsured, medicaid individuals. Participating were 5 oral surgeons & 6 pediatric dentists that can refer out to on a rotating basis.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 90%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -120.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.17; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 33%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.9% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.2% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.