Red Philanthropy Consulting

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
862902513
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Arvada, CO, USA
Phone
3035266774
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Philanthropy, Charity, Voluntarism Promotion

Reported finances

Revenue
$135,054
Expenses
$135,036
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AMY YANDA-LEE (BOARD PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • AMY YANDA-LEE (BOARD PRESIDENT)
  • ANNE GREEN (BOARD TREASURER)
  • MARCELLA WEAVER (BOARD SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Red philanthropy consulting is committed to inspire affluent families to give generously and strategically to nonprofit organizations doing high-impact, sustainable, value-driven work. We will work with nonprofit organizations who are focused on education, economic development, faith-based, veteran affairs, and organizations working to alleviate poverty, and teach them how to successfully develop and grow their organizations. We plan to reach out to nonprofit partners to help them communicate clearly and effectively to the affluent community to ensure a higher likelihood of support and partnership. Our programs and activities will be conducted by our board members and volunteers. We plan on allocating 100% of our time towards our activities. Our programs will be funded by individual donors, corporate sponsors, and grants.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, red philanthropy provided strategic advisory services to funders and nonprofit organizations, supporting efforts to maximize social impact and sustainability. The organization worked with 17 nonprofit partners on 17 philanthropic projects, providing more than 1,000 hours of counsel, research, and strategic guidance. Red philanthropy played a dual role as both a philanthropic advisor for funders and a capacity-building consultant for nonprofit partners, helping to facilitate over $1.5 million in grant funding. Key initiatives included nonprofit advisory support in fundraising strategy, board training, strategic planning, communications, and impact evaluation. The organization conducted 12 research initiatives, and attended the highly-regarded skoll world forum. It facilitated 15 strategic planning sessions and developed a family engagement plan to form a foundation. Additionally, red philanthropy conducted partner site visits to assess impact and supported trust-related strategic planning efforts. With a commitment to advancing high-impact philanthropy, red philanthropy continues to bridge the gap between funders and nonprofit organizations, fostering long-term, effective social change.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -17.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -54% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.