Red Monastery Project

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
050556629
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2016
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2156273561
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Humanities Organizations
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Expenses
$1,242
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$31,427

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELIZABETH BOLMAN (PRESIDENT AND PROJECT MNGR)

People named in this filing

  • ELIZABETH BOLMAN (PRESIDENT AND PROJECT MNGR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Restoration of the red monastery church.

What it reported doing in 2016

The project is designed to conserve circa 6th - 8th century wall paintings in the enclosed eastern part of an ancient monastic church near sohag, egypt. Restoration will lead to sustainable tourism in egypt, drawing tourists and ensuring the long-term survival of the red monastery. The project has been completed. There will be no further grant funds received. There will be no repayment of liabilities owed to the president and project manager.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -139.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -31.1% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -17.9% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2013 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.