Red Knot Development
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 863170775
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Dothan, AL, USA
- Phone
- 3347018758
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $144,184
- Expenses
- $80,444
- Assets
- $215,074
- Liabilities
- $35,950
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES B HARRISON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JAMES B HARRISON (PRESIDENT)
- JASON MILLER (BOARD MEMBER)
- CARSON MCNEAL (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Red knot development accomplishes good in tanzania through education-based initiatives in the areas of agriculture, livelihoods, and sport.
What it reported doing in 2024
Healthy people living in healthy communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.3%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 95.5%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 44.2%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.67; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 72.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 71.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 60.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.3% of revenue deployed · 95.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $77K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.