Red Glasses Movement Llc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824705624
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Grand Rapids, MI, USA
- Phone
- 6163252100
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $76,334
- Expenses
- $35,596
- Assets
- $110,427
- Liabilities
- $350
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KELLY JANDERNOA (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KELLY JANDERNOA (PRESIDENT)
- CARL JANDERNOA (SECRETARY)
- MEREDITH MACZKA (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organizations primary exempt purpose is to inspire and encourage individuals to lead positive, impactful lives by promoting a message of hope and encouragement. This is achieved through the distribution of red glasses, which symbolize viewing the world through a lens of optimism and boldness, as inspired by audrey's legacy of love and fearlessness. The glasses serve as a reminder to reach out to others and brighten their day, embodying the principles of living boldly, loving big, and passing it along. The organization aims to advance this mission through organizing events, community gatherings, and maintaining an online and social media presence to proclaim and affirm this inspirational message.
What it reported doing in 2024
Pass it along promise provided a grant of 314 to support the red glasses movement in schools and organizations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.4%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0.9%; rating input score 1
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 53.4%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.1; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -182.8% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 27.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 39% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0.4% of revenue deployed · 0.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $314 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.