Red Door Jackson C/o Jackson Leadership Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474260513
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Jackson, MS, USA
- Phone
- 6018967479
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $83,044
- Expenses
- $197,086
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JANEE TISBY (PRESIDENT)
- HEATH BENNETT (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
- EMILY HARDIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- JANEE TISBY (PRESIDENT)
- HEATH BENNETT (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
- SAMUEL GREGORY (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide free tutoring and mentoring to students k-12th grade.
What it reported doing in 2021
A certificate of dissolution was filed with the Mississippi secretary of state to dissolve the nonprofit corporation. Red door jackson has ceased operations and has donated their remaining assets and cash to the jackson leadership foundation, a Mississippi nonprofit corporation, to continue the programs (mentoring, summer wellness, camp) of the organization under the leadership of emily hardin, program director. The board believes that jackson leadership foundation will continue to further the mission of red door jackson.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 81% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 5
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 92.4%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -137.3%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.9%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 127.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -26.8% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $182K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.