Recovery Resources
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841841754
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Kingsport, TN, USA
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Prevention Only
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,070,769
- Expenses
- $1,119,624
- Assets
- $916,515
- Liabilities
- $1,047
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Meagan Fisher (President)
- John Fisher (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Tabitha Edwards (Executive Dir.): $73,503 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Empowering our communities to thrive beyond addiction
What it reported doing in 2024
Recovery homes. *2nd round of Sullivan Co Opioid Abatement dollars awarded. *Growth of Fatherhood Empowerment Initiative - completed staff training and first round of Fraternity of Fathers for 11 dads. Rehabbed Father/Kid visitation space and have had fathers having overnight with their children in that space this year. *Started a monthly music group with the financial sponsorship of the Fletcher Group and Hickory Hill Recovery - a staff hosts a music group with guitars for 12 participants to use and practice on. Teaching them basic guitar skills. *Fitness group - in partnership with Kingsport Fitness, 12 guys attend a fitness group at the gym weekly. Workout sessions, health and wellness training. *Social Enterprise - RRTN Lawncare service began in April - 3 participants make up the lawncare crew providing lawncare to the region. Total 85 individual lawns for this current season. 3 full time jobs provided. *RRTN Vehicle assistance program - Purchase of fixer up cars. Participants fix the vehicles. Put participants in the cars. Return them to being self-sufficient making employment easier and helping them get where they need to go. 20 vehicles provided this year. *Added 6 staff including 3 for lawncare crew and 3 CPRS staff for additional peer support. *Utilized funds raised from annual Polar Plunge to begin a High school scholarship program for high schoolers impacted by substance abuse. Created a committee of 5 to review scholarship applications and award those scholarships. Gave 6 $1000 scholarships to high school students this year. *Sponsored two soft ball teams - participants get a sense of engagement and community through community based softball. *Added two houses in Johnson City for a total of 30 additional beds. Those beds are full and 30 additional men are now housed raising total capacity to 147.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 62% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.1%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 89.9%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $461.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.6%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 44.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 46.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 46% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.1% of revenue deployed · 89.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 14 board members independent · 0 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $74K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.