Recovery Cooperative of Muskegon

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260210816
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Muskegon, MI, USA
Phone
2317604161
Rating
50
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Mental Health Association

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$109,717
Expenses
$116,780
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$23,007

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MONICA ORTQUIST (BOARD PRESIDENT)
  • TIFFANY MULLINS (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KIMBERLY A NOWLAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • MELISSA YOUNKERS (DIRECTOR)
  • DUDLEY CARTER (DIRECTOR)
  • ANGELA CASIANO (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Recovery coop works for the sustainable development of the mental health community through services designed and delivered by its members to implement the purpose of the organization.

What it reported doing in 2020

Peer support among persons with mental distress united voluntarily to meet their common economic, social and cultural needs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 10
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 10.4%; rating input score 10
  • Program expense ratio: 9.8%; rating input score 10

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.4%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 29.2%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 46.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -19.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 10.4% of revenue deployed · 9.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2009 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.