Reconnecting Communities Together Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464582620
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Griffin, GA, USA
Phone
4044516488
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$73,986
Expenses
$73,660
Assets
$5,326
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Cynthia Sherrod (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Cynthia Sherrod (Executive Director)
  • Cassandra Favors (Community Activist)
  • Tyrone Ward (member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Primary exempt purpose is to Educate low income individuals and provide resources to low income individuals who are not as efficient as others and to connect them to the programs and resources in the community in regards to there needs. Financial literacy, Renter education, Social skills. RCT has serviced a total of 60 participants in the calendar year.

What it reported doing in 2018

RCT accomplishments for 2018 included financial literacy money management and job readiness and not limited to other services to help families become self sufficient and employed. Rct has had a success rate for 2018 of 20 participants completing job readiness program and finding job placement. Rct has had a awesome outcome on educating the community on rental education and has also help 30 participants find suitable housing that meets their expectations of decent living.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 30
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 30.4%; rating input score 30
  • Program expense ratio: 30.5%; rating input score 31

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.4%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 127.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 174.7% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 41.4% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 30.4% of revenue deployed · 30.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $22K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2017 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.