Rebuilding Together Quad Cities
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 421351743
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Bettendorf, IA, USA
- Phone
- 5633226534
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Rehabilitation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $144,566
- Expenses
- $122,502
- Assets
- $77,881
- Liabilities
- $3,771
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROGER CATHOIR (President)
- PAULA MCNUTT (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- RICH CRADDICK (Director)
- STEVE BARTON (Executive Dir.)
- LISA LOCKHEART (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Repair and update housing for the elderly, poor and low-income homeowners and families.
What it reported doing in 2018
Program services include repairs, maintenance, renovations and updates on housing units for elderly and low-income homeowners and families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.4%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 88.9%; rating input score 89
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.3%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.4% of revenue deployed · 88.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $109K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2013 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.