Rebuilding Together of the City of Angels

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
853496858
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Studio City, CA, USA
Phone
2138781501
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing Rehabilitation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$100,809
Expenses
$113,437
Assets
$435
Liabilities
$13,244

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ZEEDA DANIELE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • KIA JEFFERS (PRESIDENT BOD)

People named in this filing

  • ZEEDA DANIELE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • KIA JEFFERS (PRESIDENT BOD)
  • OLIVIA FIELDS (SECRETARY BOD)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Rebuilding together of the city of the angels' mission is to assist low-income seniors and disabled homeowners in rehabilitating or modify their homes to improve safety, accessibility, and mobility features.

What it reported doing in 2024

General program - our safe and healthy housing practice model is the foundation of our home repair and modification work. Making it possible for household members, especially seniors, to live in their own homes longer. The repairs include fall and fire prevention, accessibility modifications, clean up, and weatherization. In certain cases, larger repairs, including stairlifts, bath and shower modifications, roof, major plumbing, and electrical improvements, are available.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.8%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 77.2%; rating input score 77

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.5%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 30.45; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -70.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -48.8% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -99.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.8% of revenue deployed · 77.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $88K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.