Rebuilding Together Miami-dade Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
650424304
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Miami, FL, USA
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,058,337
Expenses
$1,642,803
Assets
$1,087,741
Liabilities
$42,834

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ASHAKI RUCKER (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARTINA SPOLINI (EXECUTIVE DI): $142,578 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Rebuilding together miami-dade, inc. Is a nonprofit whose mission is repairing homes, revitalizing communities and rebuiling lives. The organization raises funds from the private and public sector to fund the rehabilitation services provided to qualified homeowners. The organization identifies home owners who complete an application and are qualified by the criteria established, houses are assessed and work scope agreed upon. Once there is funding, the home repairs are completed by skilled and unskilled laborers and volunteers.

What it reported doing in 2025

Rebuilding together miami-dade (rtmd) is dedicated to preserving safe, healthy, and accessible housing for low-income homeowners throughout miami-dade county. In 2025, the organization completed work on 101 properties: 99 single-family homes and 2 community buildings, directly serving 286 individuals. Repairs and home modifications completed: 21 homes received new roofs 28 homes received impact doors 13 homes received ac repair or replacement 11 homes received full bathroom conversions/ada-compliant upgrades 7 homes received impact windows 26 homes received tree trimming services population served: rtmd prioritizes the county's most vulnerable residents. Of households served in 2025, 76% included a resident over the age of 62, 52% self-identified as having one or more diagnosed disabilities, 62% were women-led households, 45% fell into the lowest income category, and 14 homeowners were honorably discharged veterans. Program highlights: safe at home: rtmd's core program delivered free repairs and modifications guided by a 25-point safety and accessibility checklist, addressing roofing, plumbing, electrical, and ada-compliant bathroom needs for low- income homeowners. Veterans at home: provided free repairs and accessibility modifications for low-income veteran households, recognizing that a significant share of the nation's veteran population lives on fixed or below-poverty incomes. Shebuilds: a women-led initiative supporting women-headed households through home repairs, free workshops led by female contractors, and distribution of home security kits, fostering independence and safety. Disaster repairs & resiliency: now in its 33rd year since its founding after hurricane andrew, this program invested over 300,000 in 2025 in disaster mitigation and preparedness, alongside continued immediate relief services (mucking, gutting, tarping) for storm-affected homes. Independent research shows every 1 invested in mitigation can save up to 6 in future disaster losses. Health & heat emergency: a new initiative launched in 2025 to address the growing public health risk of extreme heat by repairing and replacing air conditioning units for medically vulnerable and low-income residents. Building a healthy neighborhood: a multiyear community revitalization initiative active in west coconut grove/little bahamas, Florida city, and naranja, combining home repairs, renovation of shared public spaces, and workforce development to address systemic neighborhood-level challenges. Volunteer engagement: rtmd's mission was carried out with the support of 251 volunteers across 15 rebuild events, including 112 specialized/skilled volunteers and 124 general volunteers. Corporate and community partners, (including bank employees, cultural organizations, and licensed contractors), contributed both skilled trade work and hands-on finishing touches such as painting and landscaping. Community impact (unmeasurable/qualitative): beyond the physical repairs, rtmd's work restores dignity, safety, and stability for aging, disabled, and low-income homeowners who would otherwise be unable to afford critical repairs. Homeowners have reported renewed pride in their homes and neighborhoods, improved safety and mobility, and a strengthened sense of community connection. Feedback from clients consistently reflects gratitude for improved quality of life and the ability to age safely in place.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 68% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.1%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 92.8%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: $68.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.2%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.7%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.7% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.1% of revenue deployed · 92.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $143K · 8 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $771K reported
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.