Rebuilding Together Greater Harrisburg
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232811100
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Harrisburg, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7172322557
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Home Improvement and Repairs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $131,706
- Expenses
- $131,572
- Assets
- $182,420
- Liabilities
- $572
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RICK NICHOLS (President)
- DANIEL PANCHIK DSc OTRL (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- DORIS MOORE (Board Member)
- ADELIA GATES (Secretary)
- RICHARD CONKLIN (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide necessary repairs to low income homeowners and communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
During our 2024-2025 program year, over 198 RTGH volunteers repaired mobile homes, single dwellings, and row homes for 82 family members (ranging in ages of 2 to 89-years-old), in the following areas: Dauphin County:18 in the City of Harrisburg, Middletown, and Hummelstown.Cumberland County:19 in Carlisle, Mechanicsburg, Enola, Newville, and Mt. Holly Springs.Perry County:7 in New Bloomfield, Duncannon, and Shermans Dale.York County:1 in Dover.Volunteers also worked in the 5 Senses Community Garden.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 86.1%; rating input score 86
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.39; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.1%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86% of revenue deployed · 86.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $113K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.