Rebuilding Together Dayton Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311457626
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Dayton, OH, USA
Phone
9372234893
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,185,294
Expenses
$1,997,277
Assets
$1,506,619
Liabilities
$80,588

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AMY RADACHI (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • AMY RADACHI (PRESIDENT/CEO): $105,431 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Building community partnerships and providing home rehabilitation for low-income dayton area homeowners, particularly the elderly, so they may live in warmth, safety and independence.

What it reported doing in 2025

Seasonal safe@home - a program focused on seasonal based repairs, volunteer & homeowner education, and additional volunteer opportunities. Each season has a specific initiative that drives the focus, as described below: spring initiative - national rebuilding dayon the last saturday in april, hundreds of volunteers are mobilized to perform repairs and modifications for low-income elderly homeowners in the city of dayton. This has been rtd's signature event for the past 30 years.summer initiative - youth & corporate rebuild projectssince the summer of 2009, we have worked with local youth groups, work camps and companies on exterior maintenance and community projects. Throughout the summer, we provide an opportunity for groups with large projects to allow them a chance to impact area neighborhoods in need. Many of the projects involve exterior painting for homes that have been cited by code enforcement. We also look for ways to help our community by organizing neighborhood-wide clean ups. Our goal is to provide a clean and safe area for the residents.autumn initiative - heat the townsince 2010, we have collaborated with hvac contractors for our heat the town event. The contractors provide free furnace tune-ups for our identified homeowners. We have an arrangement with a local supplier to donate furnaces in the event they are needed and grants are secured to provide the installation.winter initiative - safety kitsthe installation of our safety kits addresses safety, falls prevention and energy efficiency by ensuring that smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors are properly installed, handrails and grab bars are inspected and general safety issues are managed.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 74% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.9%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 92.6%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: $56.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.6%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.9% of revenue deployed · 92.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $105K · 14 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $576K reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.