Rebuilding Together Colorado Springs Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
841326001
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Phone
3035190056
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Home Improvement and Repairs

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,239
Expenses
$35,834
Assets
$2,094
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GREGG WALSH (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • RAYMOND BUTTERWORTH (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DOUGLAS BUTLER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • GREGG WALSH (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • JOE D'INNOCENZO (DIRECTOR)
  • PETE SOLIE (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Home repair programs: rehabilitate homes of low income, elderly, and disabled citizens with crews of volunteers. Install wheelchair ramps, porches, grab bars, painted exteriors, landscaping, fences, minor home repairs, and provide weatherization services. Network with other community organizations to obtain services needed by the homeowners.recruit and supervise volunteer work crews.

What it reported doing in 2020

Worked on a total of 4 different houses for a total of 7 people served. We painted, made home repairs, replaced flooring, and performed landscaping work. We were not able to engage as many volunteers as usual due to covid-19 restrictions which also limited the number of houses we worked on.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,006.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.7% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $36K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2009 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.