Rebuild Resources Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411390019
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2011
Forms available
Form 990 2011
Location
St Paul, MN, USA
Phone
6516457055
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Residential Mental Health Treatment

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,783,999
Expenses
$2,015,842
Assets
$1,321,464
Liabilities
$743,833

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of rebuild resources is to help addicts and alcoholics become sober, self-sufficient and of service by providing meaningful, transitional employment in business enterprises it operates. These enterprises provide a safe, sober, secure, supportive, but non-enabling environment for recovery, and serve as the economic engines for the organization.

What it reported doing in 2011

The organization provides meaningful transitional employment to recovering people who want to turn their life around. These individuals remain in the organization's employ for up to six months. During this time, they work towards self-sufficiency, build a job history and work reference, gain tangible skills, work on their recovery program and develop the personal capacity to be of value to an employer. Then the organization helps them secure a more permanent, higher-wage job in the community and makes room for the next candidate.the organization's goal is to help people maintain sobriety and become self-sufficient and of service while interrupting the larger cycle of addiction, joblessness, poverty and incarceration. 98 individuals benefited from the program in 2011. Over 1,100 recovering individuals have graduated from the program since its founding in 1985 with a measured success rate of sixty-eight percent and a social return of nearly half a million dollars per successful graduate.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 73% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 89
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -13%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.56; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $101K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.