Realitycheck Research Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
884400438
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Albany, NY, USA
Phone
9143417042
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$158,544
Expenses
$82,539
Assets
$111,455
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DANIEL POMERANTZ (CHAIRMAN)
  • PAMELA LAZARUS (TREASURER)
  • ALEAH ARUNDALE (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Realitycheck is dedicated to deepening public understanding and debate through original robust investigative studies that reach the hearts and illuminate the minds of the next generation. Our aim is to first and foremost educate the public, reduce tensions and eliminate prejudice and discrimination through conducting and publicizing research and insights on topics of interest to public discussion: such as topics related to racial discrimination, antisemitism, civil rights, science and education, prevention of hate crimes, public health and safety and other related topics.

What it reported doing in 2024

Realitycheck conducts original, professional research on pressing social issues and disseminates its findings to educate the public, reduce prejudice, and improve community safety. Its studies such as the impact of holocaust education on reducing hate crimes demonstrate broad benefits across minority communities, including jewish, black, muslim, lgbtq+, hispanic, and other vulnerable groups. By publicizing results through lectures, media, and academic forums, the organization fosters meaningful public dialogue, reduces polarization, and helps prevent discrimination and hate crimes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 80% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 54
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 39.5%; rating input score 40
  • Program expense ratio: 75.9%; rating input score 76

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 47.9%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.35; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 39.5% of revenue deployed · 75.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $63K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.