Real Love
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 471140817
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
- Location
- Thomasville, AL, USA
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protestant
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $88,172
- Expenses
- $36,560
- Assets
- $60,576
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- James A Stoudenmire (President and Treasurer)
- Giovanni Rodriquez (Vice-President)
People named in this filing
- James A Stoudenmire (President and Treasurer)
- Giovanni Rodriquez (Vice-President)
- Mary Kay King (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Real Love exists for the purpose of relief of the poor the distressed and the underprivileged; the advancement of Christianity; and the advancement of education. In particular the organization supports the efforts of building training ministers and the food program to the poor and impoverished of partnering church of Guatemala. The organization also provides education scholarships for students.
What it reported doing in 2025
Partnership with church in impoverished village Guatemala to support the church with pastoral leadership maintaining of church building. ~ 50 church members. Mission team supported work of church with worship attendance visiting members assisting in teaching leadership programs. Provided funds for church furniture to accommodate Director on-field mission trip met with church leadership to evaluate programs of church and conduct vision planning for future church needs and support. The organization provides salary support to pastor non US citizen for living stipend and to attend pastor conferences for purposes of leadership development. Church building is maintained with financial support for utilities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 14
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 8.6%; rating input score 9
- Program expense ratio: 20.8%; rating input score 21
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 58.5%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.66; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 8.6% of revenue deployed · 20.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 9/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.