Real Hero's Children's Charity Fnd

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263244048
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Rolling Hills Estates, CA, USA
Phone
3103264343
Rating
33
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$9
Expenses
$13,772
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • VINCENT WOO (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • FRED EGUCHI (PRESIDENT)
  • CLAUDIA MARROQUIN (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

People named in this filing

  • VINCENT WOO (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • TAMMY GARCIA (DIRECTOR)
  • MARK ALDRETE (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide scholarships to deserving children and spouses of military families

What it reported doing in 2013

The organization identified ten (10) college bound students who were qualified to recieve scholarships ranging from $2,500-$5,000. These students received scholarships beginning with the 2011 school year and to be renewed for a four-year period depending on whether the students continue to meet the necessary requirments. During 2012, the organization began to transfer its assets and activities to the la harbor boys and girls club (this 501(c)(3) organization will be taking over the activities and exempt purpose of this organization effective in 2013). The transfer was completed during 2013.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -152,922.2%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -149% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -102.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -132.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.