Ready 2 Serve Ministries

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
113698136
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2011
Location
AirwayHeights, WA, USA
Phone
5095980749
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$177,792
Expenses
$129,164
Assets
$33,314
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Oscar Harris (Senior Pastor, Board President, Safety W2 CVIPI & Clergy Housing Allowance, 1099-NEC)

People named in this filing

  • Oscar Harris (Senior Pastor, Board President, Safety W2 CVIPI & Clergy Housing Allowance, 1099-NEC)
  • Christina Harris (Co-Pastor & Administrator, Board Treasurer W2 Clergy Housing Allowance, 1099-NEC)
  • Shannon Behrens (Minister & Program Manager-Violence Prevention W2, 1099-NEC)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Religious, church, social services

What it reported doing in 2025

Ready 2 Serve Ministries is a religious service organization church that provides church services studies trainings groups conferences. R2S serves 6080 people on Sundays weekly 712 children on Sunday weekly 1520 weekly for Bible Studies

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.5%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 27.4%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 50.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $170K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 9 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series expense component sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.