Reading Police Beneficial Assoc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 236278631
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Reading, PA, USA
- Phone
- 6107797656
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $311,589
- Expenses
- $112,805
- Assets
- $2,849,100
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KYLE RENTSCHLER (PRESIDENT)
- JAVIER RUIZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
- STRATTON MARMAROU (PRESIDENT EMERITUS)
People named in this filing
- KEVIN RUDY (DIRECTOR)
- ROBERT DUNMOYER (DIRECTOR)
- THOMAS D KOHL (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Benefits for active and retired city of reading police officers.
What it reported doing in 2024
Payments totaling $34,800 were paid in 2024 to members over age 65 to assist in paying health insurance premiums. 2024 scholarships: 18 payments of $500 each amounting to $9,000 were made to children of members. 2024 death benefits: 5 payments of $6,000 amounting to $30,000 were made to beneficiaries of deceased members. 2024 other expenses: operating expenses of $39,005 were paid to sustain the organization.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 65% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 90
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 37.7%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 63.8%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 25.26; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.5% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 37.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $113K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.