Reaching and Meeting Needs Worldwide Ministry Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
901032761
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Lithonia, GA, USA
Phone
7704825333
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$63,095
Expenses
$47,467
Assets
$231,666

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROE NALL JR (PRESIDENT/CE)

People named in this filing

  • ROE NALL JR (PRESIDENT/CE)
  • VANESSA NEALEY (SECRETARY)
  • CHERLYN WEEMS (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Reaching and meeting needs worldwide ministry inc. Is dedicated to uplifting and supporting individuals from all walks of life through providing educational and financial assistance to persons of all ages who are either homeless or struggling with health and financial issues. Our mission is to provide compassionate assistance, resources, and opportunities that empower people to overcome challenges and build a brighter future. The scriptural basis for the ministry is matthew 25:40. -and the king shall answer and say unto them, verily i say unto you, inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethern, ye have done it unto me." we believe that kindness, inclusion, and community are the foundations of meaningful change. Together, with the support of our generous donors, we are committed to making a lasting impact-one life at a time.

What it reported doing in 2025

Regardless of race, political party, faith, or religious preference, the outreach and assistance arm of reaching and meeting needs worldwide ministry has met many critical needs. Some examples of needs that have been met in 2025 are: provided 1,000 to support an individual with stage-4 cancer diagnosis, provided 5,000 rent subsidy for a mother who had to stop working to take care of her daughter who has cancer, assisted a dekalb county, ga teacher with a 2,200 subsidy due to a three month delay in effective date of contract with pay, provided a 1,300 rent payment to avoid the eviction of a person on dialysis and who could not meet or comply with the apartment rent due date, donated 500 to bethel ame zion church, brighton, al, donated 200 to fairfield baptist church, lithonia, ga to support trunk-or-teating activity, defrayed the 3,211 cost of a transmission replacment for a family without sufficient transportation, defrayed 6,000 in october mortgage payments for three families furloughed without pay, provided six 250 publix gift cards to assist familes with food, provided over 2,000 non-perishable food items for the food pantries of chapman middle school and the academy of science and foreighn language, huntsville, al to assure that students and familes would have food in the evenings and during the weekends, honored the accomplishments of three high school graduates with 50 gifts, honored the accomplishments of one college graduate with 100 gift, and distributed 800 in random acts of kindness to individuals who required assistance or were observed to be in need. This year of 2025 has demonstrated the unwavering compassion, generosity, and spiritual commitment of reaching and meeting needs worldwide ministry. Through consistent prayer, dedicated services, and targeted financial support, we have touched countless lives and provided hope during critical moments of crisis.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 52
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 45.9%; rating input score 46
  • Program expense ratio: 60.9%; rating input score 61

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.8%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.88; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -12% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 45.9% of revenue deployed · 60.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $29K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.