Reach One Touch One Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201037726
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Cleveland, TN, USA
- Phone
- 8885403439
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $639,762
- Expenses
- $640,071
- Assets
- $156,305
- Liabilities
- $122,811
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANIELLE CUNNINGHAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (FROM OCT))
- HOLLY ROLLINS (BOARD PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DANIELLE CUNNINGHAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (FROM OCT)): $51,300 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Reach one - touch one ministries (rotom) provides care of elderly and destitute seniors and their dependents in uganda and ethiopa. Rotom currently serves over 900 seniors.
What it reported doing in 2025
Extra gifts for seniors: the rotom extra gifts program gives donors the opportunity to provide additional, practical support to the seniors they sponsor by contributing funds for specific, life-improving needs. Through this program, donors can help meet essential gaps that go beyond basic sponsorship, such as installing water tanks, building pit latrines, supplying extra food, providing bedding, constructing kitchen shelters, repairing roofs, or making critical home improvements. Each contribution is directed toward tangible items that directly enhance a senior's health, safety, and daily living conditions. By participating in the extra gifts program, donors play a hands-on role in addressing urgent needs and creating lasting, meaningful change in the lives of the seniors they support.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 96% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.9%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 86.9%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.8 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.79; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.9% of revenue deployed · 86.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $556K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $51K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.